日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / News Type Content Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Open Court for Capital Appeal Cases
Adjust font size:

According to a directive, which came into effect yesterday, open court sessions are now mandatory for death sentence trials in the second instance.

 

The move is considered a major step towards ensuring cautious imposition of capital punishment and guaranteeing human rights.

 

It is expected to ensure a stricter review of verdicts passed by lower courts, and accused persons and their lawyers will have more opportunities to defend their case through court debate.

 

Previously, most appellate or high courts at the provincial, municipality or autonomous region level merely reviewed legal documents if a lower court's decision was challenged. No second hearing would be called for. The practice has been criticized for being a miscarriage of justice.

 

It was only in the second half of this year that all death sentence appeal cases were heard in open court.?

 

According to ruling issued by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate capital cases with a two-year reprieve will be reheard, as will cases where defendants have new evidence to produce or if the public prosecutor lodges a protest.

 

In addition, court presidents or chief judges from tribunals will preside over extremely complicated and difficult cases.

 

According to Chinese law, municipal-level intermediate courts have the right to impose the death sentence after an initial trial.

 

If the accused appeals or the public prosecutor lodges a protest against the initial sentence, a higher provincial-level court hears the case.

 

To hear death penalty appeals in open session is only one step in making judges more cautious about delivering the death penalty, as well as ensuring their decisions are just and well grounded.

 

The Supreme People's Court has also decided to withdraw its powers to re-examine all death penalty verdicts and?give the final nod to executions. But no timetable has been given.

 

The nation's highest court currently reviews and makes the final decisions on certain death penalty cases, including economic crimes, but gives the power of sentencing for offences such as murder and arson to provincial-level courts.

 

(China Daily September 26, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Revision of Death Penalty System Urged
- Experts Call for Review of Sentencing
- Supreme Court's Review of Death Sentences Reinstated
- Appeals on Death Penalty in Open Court
- China Reforms Death Penalty Trials in 2006: Top Judge
- Supreme Court to Review All Death Penalty Cases
Most Viewed >>
- World's longest sea-spanning bridge to open
- Yao out for season with stress fracture in left foot
- 141 seriously polluting products blacklisted
- China starts excavation for world's first 3G nuclear plant
- Irresponsible remarks on Hu Jia case opposed 
- 'The China Riddle'
- China, US agree to step up constructive,cooperative relations
- FIT World Congress: translators on track
- Christianity popular in Tang Dynasty
- Factory fire kills 15, injures 3 in Shenzhen

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 沁源县| 疏附县| 临江市| 永德县| 神木县| 双江| 菏泽市| 北川| 綦江县| 固镇县| 库伦旗| 澄城县| 高淳县| 大港区| 莎车县| 井冈山市| 克什克腾旗| 额敏县| 佛学| 璧山县| 南充市| 建水县| 长兴县| 北京市| 堆龙德庆县| 高台县| 呼和浩特市| 陆良县| 呼图壁县| 临安市| 江山市| 靖宇县| 德江县| 上杭县| 汽车| 休宁县| 达拉特旗| 台北市| 台山市| 偏关县| 绥滨县|