日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

U.S. court puts on hold Calif. same-sex marriage until Dec.

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua, August 17, 2010
Adjust font size:

A federal appeals court put on hold Monday the Proposition 8 regarding same-sex marriage in California until at least December when it considers broader constitutional questions.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said in a brief order that it would hold a hearing in early December on whether it would even hear an appeal of a judge's ruling striking down Proposition 8, the voter-approved measure that banned same-sex marriage in the state.

U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco ruled on Aug. 4 that Proposition 8, which was approved by California voters in 2008, violated the 14th Amendment that guarantees equal protection to all Americans.

He put a stay on the ruling and, with opponents of same-sex marriage arguing that weddings should not be permitted until the case is heard by appellate courts to avoid confusion, he ruled last week that the stay should be lifted at 5 p.m. Wednesday, pending any intervention by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Attorneys for ProtectMarriage.com appealed Walker's decision and requested that a stay remain in effect until the appeal is heard.

The appellate panel indicated on Monday it wants to hear arguments about whether ProtectMarriage.com has legal standing to pursue the appeal at a hearing held during the week of Dec. 6 in San Francisco.

It ordered both sides to present arguments on whether the campaign for Proposition 8 has legal authority to appeal Walker's order. Until that hearing, same-sex marriages will remain on hold.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown, both as the original defendants in the lawsuit, have declined to appeal the case.

California voters approved Proposition 22, which specified in state law that only marriages between a man and a woman are valid in California in March 2000. Eighty years later, the state Supreme Court ruled the law was unconstitutional because it discriminated against gays, and an estimated 18,000 same-sex couples got married in the ensuing months.

Opponents of same-sex marriage quickly got Proposition 8 on the November 2008 ballot to amend the state constitution, and it was approved by a margin of 52.5 percent to 47.5 percent. The approval led to statewide protests and lawsuits challenging the legality of Proposition 8.

In May 2009, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, but also ruled that the unions of roughly 18,000 same-sex couples who were wed in 2008 would remain valid.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 五河县| 容城县| 开原市| 乐东| 呼和浩特市| 布拖县| 辽源市| 民权县| 兴宁市| 吉水县| 汝城县| 舞钢市| 太康县| 尚义县| 红河县| 通州市| 灵寿县| 鲜城| 高密市| 锡林浩特市| 峨边| 商城县| 京山县| 涿鹿县| 建昌县| 东源县| 汝南县| 武宣县| 光山县| 余干县| 乌兰察布市| 邵阳县| 塔河县| 常州市| 井陉县| 巩义市| 房产| 霞浦县| 遵义县| 唐山市| 庐江县|