日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Videos ? Latest ? Feature ? Sports ? Your Videos
 

Draft marriage law under debate

Draft marriage law under debate
 
0 CommentsPrint E-mail CNTV, November 20, 2010
Adjust font size:

 

China may recognize pre-marital property as buyer's personal assets. This is part of the Supreme People's Court's latest interpretation of the new marriage law.

It's the first court paper to touch on the property issue since mortgages became more common in China, and housing prices jumped to a new high.

The interpretation also clarifies some other thorny issues, including mistresses. Yuan Xiaoyuan takes a look at the controversial court paper, and what impact it may have on current and would-be couples.

Each year, millions of Chinese people get married, but the latest interpretation may cause those with marriage plans to think twice.

It touches on real estate ownership after divorce, a major source of assets disputes for divorced couples.

It is now clear that if one person pays the down payment, and registers the home under his or her name before the marriage, that person will be entitled to keep the property after a divorce. This means the other part may not enjoy property assets after divorce, even if he or she paid parts of the mortgage debt before. Instead, they can only get the money equivalent to their payment for the mortgage debt.

Also homes registered under one persons name, but purchased by his or her parents, will be considered to be that person's own property, not the common property of the couple.

This is quite different from the current situation, where both husband and wife own the property, no matter who bought it. The traditional thoughts make many find the new rules unacceptable.

Opposer, said, "It's unreasonable. Property is undoubtedly the common asset of married couples."

"Do you need to separate the assets that clearly? We are one family after all. "

Street interviews show that 90 percent of female respondents oppose the new rules, while the same proportion of male respondents support it.

Supporter, said, "It's reasonable. The property should be owned by those who bought it."

This is because the husband is usually obliged to buy property according to traditional Chinese customs. A divorce now would no longer mean huge financial losses for them.

But experts warn that the new marriage law needs to consider the interests of the disadvantaged side.

Tan Jun, Lawyer, Guangzhou Datong Law Firm, said, "The law can protect those who have their own property, but it also needs to clarify measures to protect the rights of those without property."

The interpretation of the draft marriage law has opened up public debates.

But for married couples, the meaning of love may not be gauged by properties.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 元阳县| 古浪县| 永定县| 江川县| 美姑县| 肥乡县| 土默特右旗| 凤山市| 晋中市| 栖霞市| 上虞市| 榆中县| 邵东县| 沈丘县| 乃东县| 绥阳县| 桂平市| 太仆寺旗| 东方市| 玉环县| 兴业县| 凤庆县| 涟源市| 宁海县| 贵州省| 石嘴山市| 广安市| 芦山县| 安福县| 宾阳县| 商河县| 新乡县| 屏边| 泉州市| 宜川县| 丰台区| 贵溪市| 内江市| 北安市| 星座| 辰溪县|