日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

US 2016 election is a global risk

By Dan Steinbock
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, April 15, 2016
Adjust font size:

Currently, the leading Democratic presidential candidates, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, are approaching the final showdown. Concurrently, the Republican establishment - including Senate's majority leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan- is struggling to undermine the real estate mogul Donald Trump's campaign by promoting Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Kasich and less-known 'dark horses.'

After Wisconsin and New York, the leading contenders seek to consolidate their lead in the remaining delegate-rich states, including Pennsylvania in April and California and New Jersey in May.

Until November, US media will be all about presidential elections, which is financially vital to the 'bottom line' of the news organisations and media networks that financially rely increasingly on the expensive political media campaigns. As investigative journalism is largely dead, American democracy is increasingly threatened by big money, which now makes and breaks media buys, candidate campaigns and brokered conventions.

Americans' trust gap with Washington

In the past few months, Brazil's political turmoil has filled international headlines. According to Gallup, only 15% of Brazilians approve of the performance of their political leaders. What remains less understood is that about as few or fewer Americans approve of the job of the Congress. In the US, the trust in the national leadership is at record low.

Politically, Americans are fed up. According to polls, two out of every three are dissatisfied with the direction of the country, while most Democrats and Republicans believe that their party no longer cares about the middle class. As a result, most will vote on the basis of domestic issues (economy, jobs, immigration, and health care).

Intriguingly, polls also suggest that, if elections were held today and determined by votes alone, Wall Street's favorite Democrat, Hillary Clinton would beat Trump, possibly Cruz but would lose to Governor John Kasich. Even more intriguingly, the self-declared democratic socialist Bernie Sanders would beat Trump, Cruz and Kasich each and all.

However, US elections are increasingly about campaign financing and - after recent legislative changes (including the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC) that have made possible the ever-larger presence of big corporate donors - about big, very big money. A couple of years ago, some observers used to criticise the role of political action committees (PACs) in the US elections. Today, that's so passé.

At the moment, current candidates have raised an estimated $620 million, whereas the so-called super PACs, which first emerged in 2012 campaigns, have already raised more than $410 million - some 40% of the total. Technically, super PACs are independent political committees. Yet, they can support a candidate with unlimited, often anonymous donations from corporations, unions, associations or individuals.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
1   2   3   4   5   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 高邑县| 图片| 称多县| 长白| 沙田区| 海丰县| 视频| 富民县| 新安县| 吴江市| 博客| 和顺县| 东莞市| 宜良县| 古蔺县| 扎囊县| 桐城市| 高青县| 盐源县| 遵义市| 聂拉木县| 金川县| 积石山| 白河县| 金乡县| 萨嘎县| 中牟县| 河间市| 安义县| 城市| 廊坊市| 兴宁市| 时尚| 怀来县| 于都县| 孙吴县| 汝州市| 城固县| 刚察县| 清水河县| 红安县|