日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

China's 'Belt and Road' initiative and the EU's 'Juncker Plan'

By John Ross
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, January 16, 2016
Adjust font size:

The overlap of the Juncker Plan's ideas with China's Belt and Road initiative is evident. China's new distinctive idea in the initiative, as with parallel ones such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), is explicitly tying together trade and infrastructure investment initiatives.

Previous post-World War II trade initiatives up to the creation of the World Trade Organisation, all led by the U.S., focused on tariff and legal changes. Adding infrastructure investment and financing necessary to create it as a central element was China's innovation - an example of "thought leadership."

The first success illustrating the power of China's new form of economic initiative was the U.K.'s decision, followed by other major European countries including Germany, to join the AIIB despite U.S. objections. The convergence of the Juncker Plan with the Belt and Road initiative is an example of the same process involving an even greater number of European countries.

At first sight it might appear strange that the idea of closely linking trade and infrastructure investment was not put forward earlier by Western leaders. The beneficial economic effect of both trade and investment, and the correlation of the two, is well established in economics. The classic "Western" study of the advantages of "openness" in trade, by Sachs and Warner, found: "Open economies had significantly higher investment-to-GDP ratios, and that [an open economy] raised the investment ratio by an average of 5.4 percentage points." Therefore why was it China that first explicitly linked these in a coherent new international policy?

Practically China learnt from the advantages of its domestic economic structure compared to the West. The Western private sector economies are dominated by a mantra "private is good, state is bad." Therefore proposals for inevitably state led infrastructure investment by Summers, Wolf etc., encountered fierce ideological opposition - as well as few strong structures existing to implement the policy.

In China in contrast, as restated by the 3rd plenum of the 18th CPC Central Committee: "We must unswervingly… give full play to the leading role of the state-owned sector." In China's economy both a private and state sector exist and the state can therefore play a key role in initiatives such as infrastructure investment.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2   3   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 巴彦淖尔市| 揭阳市| 广州市| 永登县| 朝阳区| 中卫市| 白沙| 广元市| 塔城市| 浪卡子县| 泸定县| 金塔县| 江阴市| 莱西市| 赞皇县| 稻城县| 镇远县| 精河县| 新蔡县| 宁夏| 松溪县| 南投市| 德州市| 洛浦县| 米脂县| 休宁县| 定南县| 康乐县| 易门县| 乌鲁木齐县| 雷州市| 毕节市| 常山县| 永定县| 离岛区| 义马市| 晋州市| 辉南县| 金堂县| 九龙县| 循化|