日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Shall we all be Charlie: a US-Europe comparison

By Shen Dingli
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, February 4, 2015
Adjust font size:

This said, even "disrespect" of one's own values should not be responded with radical means including violence. That is why globally France has been sympathized with. Nevertheless, such comfort has to be properly received as it contains the message of tolerance. To the surprise of many, the Charlie Hebdo reprinted that issue which evoked the terrorist attack, and published a new issue that portraits the Prophet again. Legally this has violated no restriction, but culturally the French cartoon magazine, with many supporters behind it, contrasts a lot with the political code that many Americans have followed.

The aforementioned difference between American and European response to the Charlie Hebdo illustrates the boundary of freedom – the liberty of media may not go without a limit. At political level, the fundamental value of democracy lies in the essential assumption of mutual respect, as any minority or ethnic group has a right to express. But in terms of social and economic impact, any such expression has to be weighed against cost. An unchecked freedom could likely lead to social unrest, so one has to balance rights and obligation.

Such common sense actually applies widely. Many countries have adopted media censorship on certain substances such as anti-society, extremism, or pornography. But on culturally sensitive area, it is more up to an individual to allow self-censorship and the government needs to encourage proper balance of tolerance and freedom. A mature society has to be able to get the best of them, rather than to be harmed by unlimited liberty and unbalanced tolerance.

Thus, to be a responsible Charlie might be more important than to be a mere Charlie, which stresses an abstract concept of freedom. Appreciating the right of liberty, while being sensible of other's culture, brings more benefit but less harm than otherwise. The truth is neither "We are all Charlie", nor "We are not Charlie", but "We are not all Charlie".

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:http://www.shenbo75.com/opinion/shendingli.htm

This article was first published at Chinausfocus.com To see the original version please visit http://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/shall-we-all-be-charlie-a-u-s-europe-comparison/

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2   3  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 本溪市| 涞水县| 邢台市| 和静县| 尚志市| 连南| 永德县| 南木林县| 蒙阴县| 宣威市| 玉田县| 新野县| 华蓥市| 广南县| 乌兰浩特市| 仁寿县| 隆昌县| 洪洞县| 九龙城区| 万宁市| 申扎县| 上犹县| 平陆县| 上高县| 色达县| 阿克陶县| 云梦县| 浠水县| 长岛县| 临武县| 弋阳县| 腾冲县| 华宁县| 康定县| 奉贤区| 东丽区| 谢通门县| 凌海市| 瑞昌市| 昭通市| 化隆|