日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Environmental impact assessment must be made public

By Mao Da
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 4, 2014
Adjust font size:

An environmental impact assessment should serve as legal evidence of the health of a project. But since a negative environmental assessment, flashed in the media, could deal a blow to the reputation and credibility of a project, the Shenzhen authorities are reluctant to make it public.

The lack of public participation in environmental impact assessments is a vital flaw in cases like the Xiaping landfill. In a public project, public supervision and technical assessment are normally separated; the former is conducted by the construction department which is not in charge of environmental impact assessment.

Soliciting public opinions often depends on simply publishing (or posting online) questionnaires, which can hardly guarantee real public participation. In comparison, a public hearing would do a better job of clearing the distrust between the public and environmental department officials.

But neither incineration nor landfills can fundamentally improve the over-burdened garbage disposal systems of many Chinese cities, especially the mega ones such as Beijing, which generates more than 18,000 tons of household garbage a day.

Should the Xiaping landfill's operation be suspended, the Shenzhen environment bureau would have to relocate it in accordance with public demand and professional advice. More importantly, reducing unnecessary daily waste, which requires an efficient garbage classification and utilization system, remains the key to efficient waste disposal.

For instance, local governments should encourage individual people, as major waste generators, to sort their garbage at source into kitchen waste, and recyclable and non-recyclable wastes. The local governments also have to optimize the use of transportation and disposal methods, and discourage the use and production of use-and-throw products like tableware and excessive packaging.

When it comes to supervision, all environmental impact assessments must be made public, because that is what the law demands. Besides, a legal accountability mechanism should be put in place to deal with cases in which earlier assessments have failed to be incisive and thus made matters worse. And since every step in the waste disposal system is interconnected, governments should seek public opinion and take remedial measures instead of playing hide-and-seek with the people.

The author is a researcher at Nature University, an environmental protection NGO in Beijing. The article is an excerpt from his interview with China Daily's reporter Cui Shoufeng.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 邹城市| 儋州市| 黄浦区| 三门峡市| 万年县| 张家港市| 安宁市| 准格尔旗| 开阳县| 龙州县| 南昌市| 南丰县| 南靖县| 玉环县| 塘沽区| 雷山县| 大埔区| 海口市| 静宁县| 洪江市| 乐亭县| 武宣县| 绍兴县| 黄梅县| 崇礼县| 连州市| 剑河县| 乌海市| 托克托县| 铜陵市| 盘锦市| 洞头县| 黑河市| 长岛县| 长岭县| 乡宁县| 东源县| 闽清县| 凯里市| 皮山县| 岑溪市|