日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Destruction of students' cell phones inappropriate punishment

By Ember Swift
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, October 22, 2013
Adjust font size:

A recent report of a school in central China's Henan Province choosing a violent form of discipline for a student who broke a ban on cell phones during the exam period is yet another example of unnecessarily extreme measures in Chinese schools.

Students are forced to publically smash their cell phones during the exam period in a school in central China's Henan Province. [Photo: www.dahe.cn]

Students are forced to publically smash their cell phones during the exam period in a school in central China's Henan Province. [Photo: www.dahe.cn]



The students were forced to publically smash their own cell phones in the presence of school officials and parents. Despite the students having a signed contract with the school that informed them in advance of this consequence, the school still enforced an illegal act – destroying private property – in order to reprimand students about exam integrity and respect for the rules. This is a classic example of the famous saying: "two wrongs don't make a right."

Regardless of the method by which students disregard the rules and/or the sanctity of an exam room, this kind of violent act is inappropriate, to say the least. There are so many other options than the extreme path chosen by the Mianchi High School administrators. For instance, the school could have confiscated the phones for a set period of time and then returned these items to the parents of the students who were caught breaking the ban.

Despite the tragic event in early September in Fuzhou, Jiangxi Province in which a teacher was brutally murdered by a student after having confiscated this student's mobile phone, such a result is unlikely to recur. School officials must not be frightened into unnecessarily extreme responses such as this violent destruction of private property simply in response to the one anomalous event in Jiangxi. The Fuzhou teacher took appropriate action; his student engaged in criminal retribution. He will be punished by the court system.

Another option for the Henan school could have been a scholastic punishment that included not only confiscation of the device, but also a forced penalty on their exam results by a set percentage, thus demonstrating a system in which the punishment fits the crime. In this way, the punishment relates to the activity itself (the exam) rather than placing the focus on the offending item (the cell phone).

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 麟游县| 眉山市| 通渭县| 湛江市| 利津县| 景洪市| 黑河市| 峨眉山市| 潜山县| 桐梓县| 双峰县| 定西市| 襄汾县| 庄浪县| 龙陵县| 鹿泉市| 新宾| 马边| 襄樊市| 东山县| 合水县| 金坛市| 宝兴县| 微博| 三亚市| 都江堰市| 金堂县| 屯门区| 七台河市| 淄博市| 社旗县| 茂名市| 泰来县| 淮安市| 富宁县| 辽阳县| 尉犁县| 胶州市| 桃源县| 延寿县| 寻甸|