US faces the gun and tax cliffs
- By Stephan Richter
0 Comment(s)
Print
E-mail China Daily, January 24, 2013
![Held hostage [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]](http://images.china.cn/attachement/jpg/site1007/20130124/001ec949c22b126adbaf06.jpg "Held hostage [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]") |
|
Held hostage [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn] |
What the NRA is peddling is an incredible hoax. Americans can no longer go on accumulating limitless debt but they can still buy weapons at every Walmart and plenty of other stores. The offer on hand to deal with one's frustrations is not to consume, but to shoot.
The blindness of American society, which is generally a very fearful one, is staggering. Putting that many weapons out there - almost 1 for every American man, woman and child - is not just bewildering. It is plain dumb.
Republicans always cherish supply-side economics. They ought to know that the stuff out there will exhibit a tendency to be used. In addition, these are nerve-wracking times for many people. They feel extremely insecure economically. Seeing Americans going on a gun-buying spree in the decade when incomes stagnated and a quarter of the population was for all practical purposes unemployed must be considered somewhat suicidal.
It is not unlike the "wisdom" shown by the Reagan administration to equip Afghan "freedom fighters" with stinger missiles to shoot down Soviet helicopters. It sounded good until the day American planes in the skies over Afghanistan were being shot down with the same US-made weapons.
The US should fix its problems not for people abroad to continue holding it in high regard. It ought to do so for one reason and one reason alone: self-preservation. Self-preservation of the nation, by the way, was the sole intent of the Second Amendment, contrary to how some recent court cases have sought to reinterpret the US constitution to serve the commercial arguments promoted by the NRA and its acolytes.
The only grammatically correct way to read the Second Amendment ("A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.") is not to see it as two independent clauses. Rather, the first half clearly qualifies (in fact, conditions) the second.
Moreover, the oppressor against whom the people need to militate today is no longer the state. If anything, it is the NRA and other gun-toting people who hold civilized America hostage with their gun fetish.
The people cannot defend themselves against the proliferation of assault weapons and other unnecessary weapons, but their "state" - their government - can. Self-preservation is the one and only reason the US should resolve the gun issue. If it fails that test, it will have a hard time staying on the track of modernity.
As a matter of fact, after the Newtown school massacre, there cannot be any doubt that a revised Second Amendment to the US constitution is urgently required. And it should read: "A well regulated society, being necessary to the security of a free people, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall be abridged." The very notion of civilization demands no less.
The author is the publisher of The Globalist and president of The Globalist Research Center.
