日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Settle claims in court

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, January 4, 2012
Adjust font size:

A long road ahead [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]

A long road ahead [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]

Tianjin Maritime Court recently accepted a lawsuit by 29 mariculture farmers who claim the oil spill in Bohai Bay killed their clams and sea cucumbers. It is the first such case since the oil spill was first reported six months ago.

The fishermen from Hebei province are claiming 234.7 million yuan ($37.25 million) in compensation from ConocoPhillips China to cover their mariculture losses and 7.03 million yuan ($1.12 million) from China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) to cover their damage evaluation costs.

The State Oceanic Administration is also planning to file an oceanic ecological damage indemnity claim on behalf of the State.

There were some doubts as to whether the courts would accept indemnity claims resulting from the oil spill, as it is thought it will be difficult for the mariculture farmers to prove the causal relationship between the oil spill and their losses, even if they are the immediate victims of the pollution, and because the local governments concerned and some related administrative departments have been reluctant to support such cases. Some have even set up obstacles to prevent the courts from registering compensation cases resulting from the oil spill.

However, with regard the first point, the burden of proof should be on ConocoPhillips to prove there was no causal relationship between the oil spill and the mariculture losses.

The Tianjin court's decision signifies related departments have already determined the mariculture farmers have the right to claim compensation and judicial authorities and administration departments can make active efforts to remove any obstacles to law suits against the two companies.

If the courts deal with such cases according to the law, complicated conflicts can be clarified and resolved in a proper and orderly manner, which will prevent the disputes from fermenting and escalating.

Tianjin Maritime Court's acceptance of the mariculture farmers' case embodies the spirit of rule of law that disputes should be settled and rights be protected by law, offering a good example to solve complicated and "troublesome" problems in the future.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 诏安县| 浮山县| 开鲁县| 深圳市| 河曲县| 贵德县| 明水县| 仁布县| 新昌县| 蛟河市| 连江县| 衢州市| 灵丘县| 和硕县| 自治县| 荔浦县| 清水河县| 尚志市| 鲁甸县| 大新县| 阳原县| 定西市| 建平县| 文山县| 平武县| 连城县| 抚州市| 锦屏县| 合作市| 思茅市| 墨脱县| 赤水市| 宁远县| 冕宁县| 中江县| 深水埗区| 武山县| 屏南县| 保亭| 双牌县| 清涧县|