日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Only more hot air expected

By Yang Fuqiang
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 6, 2011
Adjust font size:

As the last United Nations conference on climate change before the expiry of the Kyoto Protocol in 2012, the ongoing conference in Durban, South Africa, bears people's hopes that all world members will uphold their responsibilities for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

However, a new global economic recession since the onset of this year, the high unemployment rate in the United States, the increased risk of the collapse of the euro amid the deteriorating debt crisis in some eurozone countries and political unrest across the world, have cast a long shadow over the prospects of the Durban meeting.

The key to success at the Durban conference lies in whether or not participating countries can reach an agreement on a second commitment period of the outgoing Kyoto Protocol. This will lay the groundwork for any international talks on climate change. Otherwise, any meaningful action on emissions reduction will be out of the question. Failing to agree a second commitment period will be the equivalent of discarding the Kyoto Protocol and will produce significant adverse long-term effects on any international talks on climate change.

So far, a majority of Annex 1 countries - mainly industrialized countries - have failed to fully fulfill their emission reduction commitments as demanded by the first commitment period of the protocol. In this context, the failure to reach a deal on the second commitment period will result in the absence of a legally binding document that commits all parties to continue to fulfill their unfinished commitments in the years ahead.

The Durban conference should also try to take substantial steps towards guaranteeing funds to help impoverished countries deal with climate change, transform their economic growth modes and embark on a low-carbon and green development path. Developing countries have stressed many times that they need a growing amount of funds every year to press ahead with these. Developed countries should also make some institutional arrangements to help small and impoverished nations which lack enough political, economic and systematic capacity, to follow a low-carbon and green development path.

In recent years, developed countries have raised their calls for developing countries to undertake a bigger role in the reduction of global GHG emissions. Data shows that in 1990, industrialized nations accounted for more than 70 percent of the globe's GHG emissions, but their proportion had declined to 50 percent by 2010. The developing countries' proportion of global GHG emissions is expected to increase to 70 percent somewhere between 2040 and 2050. However, the increased proportion of emissions by developing countries will not change the fact that their per capita emission volume is still far below that of their developed counterparts.

So far, major developing countries such as China, India, Brazil and South Africa have formulated their own programs for further emission reductions, in sharp contrast with some developed countries' defiance of basic international norms on climate change and their stubborn calls for less-developed countries to undertake bigger international responsibilities incommensurate to their development status.

It is developing countries' stance that all countries should comply with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and use this legally binding document to regulate their activities under the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities".

A variety of uncertainties suggest that there is not much possibility of a legally binding treaty being reached that will commit developed countries to undertaking more responsibilities for GHG emissions reduction. The probability is that a non-legally binding document will be signed at the Durban conference, just like the one agreed at the Copenhagen Conference, while leaving all the key issues pending to the next meeting.

The author is a senior climate change and energy consultant to the Natural Resources Defense Council, a New York-based environment group.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 嘉鱼县| 东兴市| 保定市| 泾阳县| 永清县| 阿瓦提县| 南皮县| 红原县| 淮北市| 伊宁市| 余庆县| 花莲市| 民权县| 万州区| 长寿区| 淳安县| 芮城县| 大安市| 商洛市| 南陵县| 玉龙| 东明县| 临安市| 北碚区| 泸水县| 惠州市| 葵青区| 东阳市| 盐津县| 谢通门县| 子长县| 巴塘县| 隆昌县| 县级市| 惠安县| 台山市| 绵阳市| 乾安县| 永定县| 修文县| 卓尼县|