日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Facing up to the difficulties of public sector reform

By Deng Yuwen
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China.org.cn, April 19, 2011
Adjust font size:

For example, Shanxi, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Chongqing were chosen to pilot public institution pension reform in 2008. But so far none of the five cities has really pushed the policy forward. No one wants to be the first. In 2009 Guangdong tried to promote an ambitious reform of the universities. But even before implementation began, the program had met strong opposition from the teaching staff and was set aside.

Of course, it is unfair to lay all the blame on the 40 million public institution workers. People are rational "economic men". They put their own interests first. When senior engineers in public institutions find out that their retirement pensions are lower than those of ordinary officials in the administration department, they will naturally say "no" to a reform that leads to such unfair treatment. The reform of public institutions implies a parallel transformation of the government and the administrative system. The slow progress of public institution reform is a reflection of the inadequate transformation of government functions. The two processes interact and weaken each other. In order to push the reform of public institutions, we need to start with government restructuring and administrative reform.

Reform of public institution reforms is also closely related with reform of the financial system and the trade system. It involves many aspects such as personnel management, income distribution, social security, and tax policy. If even one of the above fails to function properly, others will be affected and the overall effectiveness of the reform will suffer. Therefore, public institution reform must be coordinated with other reforms, and combined with supporting measures. Policy coherence will determine the overall effectiveness of the reform.

Now that reform of public institutions is under way, we must not stop halfway. But in view of the vast size and the complexity of public institutions, we should plan fully for the difficulties ahead. The reform strategy should be flexible and, in particular, should fully respect the wishes of those most affected. In this way we can protect the interests of the majority.

(This article was first published in Chinese and translated by Li Huiru)

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn

 
   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 揭阳市| 佛学| 喜德县| 台湾省| 威宁| 衡阳县| 兴宁市| 禄丰县| 浮山县| 毕节市| 西城区| 揭西县| 江口县| 长汀县| 长治市| 云霄县| 寿宁县| 大英县| 万源市| 江永县| 孝义市| 胶州市| 海阳市| 白水县| 巴中市| 崇信县| 新绛县| 辽宁省| 新丰县| 曲水县| 长葛市| 西华县| 崇义县| 临城县| 唐海县| 越西县| 左权县| 建始县| 通河县| 澄迈县| 托里县|