日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

BRIC a convenient illusion, not a lasting alliance

By Oliver Stuenkel
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, November 16, 2010
Adjust font size:

 

The BRICs were different. Since O'Neill only looked at economics and never intended to devise a political alliance when he created the term, the countries he chose were very heterogeneous. Brazil and India are two democracies that are not yet fully established in today's order, while China and Russia have been established powers since 1945.

The four disagree on virtually everything, including trade, climate change, human rights, and the reform of global governance.

Despite all this, the BRICs turned into a household term among international policy- makers. Their leaders begun to refer to themselves as "BRIC members" and agreed that they needed to strengthen "intra-BRIC" ties.

In 2009 President Lula, President Medvedev, Prime Minister Singh and President Hu Jintao met for a BRIC summit in St. Petersburg. A second BRIC summit followed in April 2010 in Brasília.

Yet after initial optimism during negotiations and grand announcements about a "new world order," the BRIC members realized that their positions were too far apart to agree on any specific measures.

The BRICs' discontent with the system and claim for a greater say, their revisionist rhetoric, the vagueness about what should be changed and their eventually reluctant acknowledgement that the system is fundamentally sound showed that reality is more complicated than fiction, and that O'Neill's category is too broad to be meaningful.

What the success of the BRIC label really showed was that scholars and investors are not the only ones who search for a category that can capture reality. Heads of state long for a meaningful way to understand the world as well. The four leaders essentially met in St. Petersburg to try on the category O'Neill had devised for them.

Rather than pointing to their similarities, their behavior reflected their strong desire to comprehend which category they themselves belong to.

In a rapidly changing world were the traditional parameters of East vs. West, North vs. South and rich vs. poor no longer provide any guidance for rising powers, trying on the "BRIC hat" was merely another episode, yet certainly not the last, in their complex search for their identity and place in a world they will soon rule.

The author is a visiting professor of International Relations at the University of S?o Paulo. He writes about emerging powers at www.postwesternworld.com. viewpoint@globaltimes.com.cn

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 澄江县| 博客| 乡城县| 灵石县| 皋兰县| 吉安市| 汕头市| 黄陵县| 云浮市| 原阳县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 涞源县| 吉林市| 兰州市| 揭阳市| 濮阳县| 曲靖市| 阿荣旗| 安化县| 滦平县| 辽宁省| 佛山市| 洛川县| 曲松县| 长岭县| 唐山市| 宜兴市| 金坛市| 连南| 道真| 吉首市| 繁昌县| 恭城| 兴义市| 安图县| 策勒县| 宁海县| 藁城市| 榆林市| 应用必备| 毕节市|