日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Obama finding scapegoat for oil spill

By Zhang Guoqing
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China.org.cn, June 14, 2010
Adjust font size:

As United States President Barack Obama presses BP harder, he has started shifting the burden of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico to the British government. On June 12, Obama told British Prime Minister David Cameron that the United Kingdom should pay for the cleanup costs and compensation claims.



Of course compensation is what concerns Americans, but Obama pressed BP and the British government because he wants to divert attention. Under great public pressure, the Obama administration needs to find a way to divert all the anger toward BP so that the administration can achieve its goals.

As efforts to contain the leak have failed, the American public and press have started criticizing Obama and his administration. A number of problems have been cited, including poor supervision before the spill, insufficient evaluations and sluggish reactions to the event. Before all of that, Obama's reopening of off-shore oil drilling made many people feel that Obama's compromising style was narrow-sighted. Many allege that he compromised on national interests by passing the bill.

It seems that Obama will get similar treatment to what former-President George W. Bush received for "Katrina-gate." Now, Obama must do PR crisis management work. This will not only curb the damage but also make BP look culpable. Fortunately for Obama, unlike Bush, he can find the exact target to blame. Bush could not lash at the hurricane.

Obama said, "I know whose ass to kick." The Obama administration told BP to pay for all the damages resulting from the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

The fact that the oil spill is affecting the U.S. is bad news for BP. If it affected other countries, BP would have the chance to bargain. But facing the powerful U.S., things are different. It is difficult to soothe the American public and media.

Finding the oil spill's culprit doesn't mean that the Obama administration will not have to pay a price. The midterm election is looming, and the oil spill may cost the Democrats votes and, subsequently, seats in congress.

The US media have argued that the oil spill will become Obama's Katrina. Some say it will deal a devastating blow to his political career. Many now blame Obama for speaking too much and doing too little.

As the oil comes closer to the shore, the public is examining Obama's ability to handle crises. If the oil spill remains unsettled, the public will not forget about the crisis. After all, the oil slick has affected the environment, tourism and the economy – major interests of the American public.

Not long ago, election experts who sided with Democrats were optimistic about the midterm election and predicted that unless something bad happens, the Democrats would lose only a small number of seats. Unfortunately for the Democrats, oil in the Gulf started to gush. Like the Obama administration, these experts didn't realize the severity of the oil spill when it started.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 康马县| 虹口区| 名山县| 稷山县| 通辽市| 宕昌县| 乌鲁木齐县| 曲靖市| 德安县| 望城县| 平潭县| 东丰县| 同德县| 谢通门县| 丹巴县| 南康市| 福贡县| 广东省| 嘉兴市| 巴楚县| 天津市| 白水县| 涞水县| 江永县| 涡阳县| 通江县| 商都县| 晋中市| 额济纳旗| 江阴市| 航空| 杭锦旗| 西盟| 吉首市| 汪清县| 泾源县| 鹤岗市| 新闻| 阳西县| 北川| 昌邑市|