日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

People at heart of administrative reform

By Grayson Clarke
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, May 12, 2010
Adjust font size:

The Chinese government is stepping up efforts to modernize public services and the institutions that help them do that.

High quality, efficient and accountable public services are essential to the government's vision of creating a fair and harmonious society. As China's wealth grows, the public's expectations of what they get from their taxes and social insurance contributions will rise with it - and each generation will have successively higher expectations than the last.

Administrative reform is fundamentally a major exercise in change management - changing the way services are delivered, how institutions account to their citizens and most fundamental of all, the way officials deal with the public.

In Europe these days, apart from our Prime Minister we look at citizens as clients and customers. Fundamental to any change program are the people who deliver the change and those that will champion it; which brings us to China's civil servants

Civil servants get a pretty poor press in China (as they do elsewhere). They are seen as cosseted, privileged, and "on the make".

For sure there are plenty of instances of waste, corruption and misuse of power. But from personal experience and from the very fact that public services do operate in China and in some cases very well and not least from the superb response to its recent disasters, I think China's public servants are an unfairly maligned bunch.

But change is needed. If a society wants its public servants to perform, it has to reward them well.

Current civil service pay levels are very low and an invitation to 'rent seeking' behavior. The current benefit package also represents a fundamental barrier to attracting people from the private sector into the civil service or to getting civil servants to move into the private sector, especially after they have passed the mid-career point.

So, the government has to steadily increase pay across the board but also relate those pay levels to the skills needed for each job and the performance achieved. In Singapore for example all civil servant salaries and even those of ministers are benchmarked against private sector equivalents.

At the same time it also needs to reduce and monetize non-salary benefits. The recent decision of Beijing Municipality to bring its public servants into the basic medical insurance scheme is a welcome development; as is the interest shown in bringing civil servants into the basic enterprise pension scheme.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 临安市| 河曲县| 徐闻县| 瓮安县| 彭阳县| 江永县| 吴桥县| 铜川市| 明溪县| 梁平县| 平南县| 拜城县| 林周县| 菏泽市| 万源市| 汝阳县| 彰武县| 读书| 遂溪县| 宜宾市| 靖宇县| 伊吾县| 洛阳市| 防城港市| 乌鲁木齐县| 永康市| 武宣县| 格尔木市| 缙云县| 辉县市| 上栗县| 云浮市| 莱阳市| 辉县市| 交城县| 织金县| 新乡市| 苗栗县| 高淳县| 西平县| 高邑县|