日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Clean melamine residue

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, February 2, 2010
Adjust font size:

With the dairy products company Sanlu bankrupt and the chief culprits sentenced to death in the wake of the 2008 melamine scandals, many naively thought that domestic dairy producers would learn and behave, and that melamine would be thing of the past.

That is why, despite the initial boycott that almost ruined local dairies, consumers have returned and the Ministry of Agriculture has reported a "better-than-expected" recovery.

But that was prior to the re-emergence of melamine-contaminated dairy products on store shelves. Five companies were found to have used melamine-tainted materials that should have been destroyed in 2008.

Stunning as it is, the discovery might not dampen the overall picture of recovery. After all, authorities have been quick to respond, and an intensive 10-day marketwide probe is underway. They have vowed to thoroughly investigate and destroy tainted milk powders produced in 2008. Considering the special prowess of Chinese-style chain of command, campaigns like this may be very effective when it comes to immediate results. In spite of the appeal for long-term solutions, the current emphasis is on immediate gains.

We have little doubt about the authorities' abilities to ferret out a number of bad examples. But the same old tactic of killing one to deter a hundred is obsolete as the remnants of melamine have clearly shown.

The Shanghai-based Panda Dairy Co Ltd, for instance, had been on the official blacklist of melamine users in the 2008 scandals. The fact that it has survived and even committed new offenses is a serious and loud alarm. And for melamine to be redistributed into the marketplace is embarrassing proof that our food safety monitoring system is not working. Though authorities have retooled the monitoring system by re-enforcing measures, personnel and heightened vigilance, it's still not enough.

Melamine and dairy products made in 2008 are potential threats to food safety. But threats can derive from multiple sources. Melamine is only one of the many harmful additives our creative countrymen have employed to reap illicit profits. Short-lived campaigns that come and go like blasts of wind are no solutions to such problems. We can only hope that Panda is the sole repeat offender in the new melamine scandals.

Besides our best wishes for the 10-day campaign, we hope that there will be a break from the "killing the chicken to scare the monkey" tradition. A real long-term solution must be able to hold all offenders, not just those adding melamine to our daily milk, accountable at all times.

So 10 days later, we need to see more repairs to fix how this nation monitors its food safety.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 洛扎县| 金乡县| 康保县| 雅江县| 武穴市| 满洲里市| 都安| 龙井市| 新泰市| 辰溪县| 靖州| 平罗县| 邳州市| 三明市| 准格尔旗| 福州市| 南涧| 陕西省| 法库县| 宜州市| 公安县| 尼勒克县| 册亨县| 丹阳市| 油尖旺区| 赤壁市| 平江县| 邢台县| 历史| 平顺县| 沙雅县| 晋江市| 东明县| 鄂尔多斯市| 铁岭市| 金沙县| 桐柏县| 苗栗市| 济南市| 天祝| 嘉荫县|