日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / International / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Chinese in top job at World Bank
Adjust font size:

In June Justin Lin Yifu, a Beijing professor, will take up the post of chief economist at the World Bank. Nothing could be a clearer sign of the times. This is the number two job in one of the two major international economic institutions, the other being the International Monetary Fund.

Earlier incumbents have included the Nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, the former US treasury secretary Lawrence Summers and the UK's Nicholas Stern. Previously the top jobs in these two outfits have always been shared between Americans and Europeans.

Lin's appointment thus marks a major break with political tradition. Hitherto there has been hardly any appointment of a Chinese to a senior position in the major international organizations. China's burgeoning importance, however, is set to change this state of affairs, with Lin's appointment likely to set the tone for the future.

In the past the World Bank, like the IMF, has been the tame captive of US and European governments, never straying from the prescribed Western free-market orthodoxy. The very public disagreement at the time of the Asian financial crisis between Stiglitz and his counterpart at the IMF, Stanley Fischer with the World Bank man strongly critical of the IMF's disastrous policy toward the crisis, and supportive of Malaysia's temporary imposition of capital controls was highly unusual. But the appointment of a Chinese chief economist takes us into an entirely new realm.

The East Asian countries have never subscribed to the neoliberal economic agenda, eschewing sweeping privatization, a minimalist role for the state and wholesale market liberalization.

At the center of Chinese policy remains a highly interventionist state and state-owned firms. Lin himself has written that the government is the most important institution, determining whether development is successful, and argues that privatization is neither necessary nor sufficient for making Chinese state-owned enterprises more efficient. Imagine such sentiments being expressed by the Bush or Clinton administration, or Gordon Brown for that matter.

1   2   3    


Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- WB names Chinese economist as vice president
- Zoellick: World Bank ready to help China quake victims
- World Bank grants loans to China's Silk Road
- World Bank seeks China's joint efforts in African development
- World Bank report advises China to optimize FDI utilization
- World Bank funds SW China highway project
Most Viewed >>
- Rising food, fuel prices to top G8 summit agenda
- Obama wins nomination, makes history
- China, India to discuss border issue
- EU urged to recognize China's market economy
- Bomb targets Danish Embassy, 6 killed
> Korean Nuclear Talks
> Reconstruction of Iraq
> Middle East Peace Process
> Iran Nuclear Issue
> 6th SCO Summit Meeting
Links
- China Development Gateway
- Foreign Ministry
- Network of East Asian Think-Tanks
- China-EU Association
- China-Africa Business Council
- China Foreign Affairs University
- University of International Relations
- Institute of World Economics & Politics
- Institute of Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies
- Institute of West Asian & African Studies
- Institute of Latin American Studies
- Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies
- Institute of Japanese Studies
主站蜘蛛池模板: 如皋市| 藁城市| 镇沅| 灵川县| 彭水| 岚皋县| 黑河市| 桃园县| 潜山县| 大荔县| 七台河市| 纳雍县| 海晏县| 延川县| 丰顺县| 家居| 平顺县| 永顺县| 建平县| 右玉县| 九江县| 潜江市| 黑龙江省| 绥德县| 乐东| 皮山县| 临安市| 安溪县| 郧西县| 安乡县| 五华县| 当雄县| 唐河县| 婺源县| 页游| 襄樊市| 牡丹江市| 广东省| 甘谷县| 九江县| 都江堰市|