日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / International / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Unwise US Policy
Adjust font size:

It makes little sense for a country to restrict its own exports while claiming to be serious about cutting its trade deficit.

If the United States insists that its increased restriction on high-tech exports to China "strikes the right balance in our complex relations with China", Chinese policymakers may have reason to doubt US motives for pressing for revaluation of the Chinese currency.

The US Commerce Department recently listed 20 separate product groups that will require export licenses. The items include high-powered computers and certain lasers.

Undoubtedly, this move smacks of Cold-War mentality. US officials argue that exports of such items will contribute to China's military modernization.

However, what makes this export control particularly counterproductive is that it comes at a moment when the US is stepping up criticism against China for the two countries' bilateral trade imbalance. Though that trade imbalance is largely a result of accelerated economic globalization, China has been seeking cooperation with the US to reduce their respective external imbalances and thus ease the global imbalance.

As a low-cost manufacturing center in the global supply chain, China is set to gain a huge trade surplus from exports. To balance its trade growth, the country has not only introduced more flexibility into its foreign exchange regime but also raised export tariffs to rein in growth of the trade surplus.

As the world's largest economy, the US can take measures to encourage its consumers to spend less and save more to cut its trade deficit. But so far, the US government and politicians have shied away from taking on this essential but unpopular job.

As a global high-tech leader, the other obvious option for the US to narrow its trade deficit is to expand its share in the global market of high-tech products. The different development levels of China and the US should make them complementary trade partners.

In fact, China is now the fourth largest export market for the US and US exports to China have been growing at a much faster rate over the past two years than its imports from China.

However, by politicizing the bilateral trade ties, the US is running counter to the interests of both sides.

Such a misdirected export curb will not only affect the growing list of US companies that export to China but also undermine bilateral or unilateral efforts the two countries have made to balance their trade relations.

(China Daily June 19, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Work on Positives of China-US Relations
- China-US Economic Tensions Expected to Endure
- US Should Look in Mirror: US Economist
- Contain Protectionism
- China Remains Biggest Partner of 2 US Ports
- China, US Seek to Ease Trade Woes
- Easing Curbs on Exports 'Key' to Cut Trade Deficit
- MOFCOM Unveils Hi-tech Purchases from US
- Yuan Hits New High Against US Dollar
Most Viewed >>
> Korean Nuclear Talks
> Reconstruction of Iraq
> Middle East Peace Process
> Iran Nuclear Issue
> 6th SCO Summit Meeting
Links
- China Development Gateway
- Foreign Ministry
- Network of East Asian Think-Tanks
- China-EU Association
- China-Africa Business Council
- China Foreign Affairs University
- University of International Relations
- Institute of World Economics & Politics
- Institute of Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies
- Institute of West Asian & African Studies
- Institute of Latin American Studies
- Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies
- Institute of Japanese Studies
主站蜘蛛池模板: 正蓝旗| 呼和浩特市| SHOW| 屯留县| 广宁县| 临沂市| 陕西省| 乳山市| 内乡县| 平塘县| 深圳市| 沈阳市| 福建省| 临澧县| 什邡市| 盐津县| 潍坊市| 广安市| 阿尔山市| 思南县| 砚山县| 诸暨市| 繁昌县| 精河县| 济南市| 喀喇沁旗| 汝阳县| 仪陇县| 田东县| 丹巴县| 桓台县| 房产| 汉阴县| 昭通市| 鸡西市| 吉隆县| 侯马市| 色达县| 长春市| 淮南市| 贵溪市|