日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Oxfam/WWF proposes 'carbon price' for shipping

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, December 3, 2011
Adjust font size:

Oxfam/WWF proposes 'carbon price' for shipping

Tim Gore

International shipping is a rapidly growing source of greenhouse gas emissions. Oxfam and WWF, the world's two major non-governmental organizations on climate change, agree that applying a "carbon price" to shipping can both reduce emissions and raise funds for climate change adaptation and mitigation in developing countries.

The two organizations have joined forces with International Chamber of Shipping (which represents over 80 percent of the world merchant fleet), urging attendees at the UN Climate Conference in Durban to make reductions in shipping.

Tim Gore, Oxfam's International Policy Advisor of Climate Change, talked with Beijing Review reporter Yu Yan about the proposal.

Can you give a brief introduction to your proposal?

Tim Gore: We apply a carbon price to shipping to reduce emissions. Part of the money collected will be used to compensate developing countries for the increase in transport costs. The remaining avenue can be directed to a Green Climate Fund.

You propose to reduce shipping emissions through the development of market-based measures. What do "market-based measures" refer to?

There is a discussion in the international Maritime Organization, looking at market-based measures to reduce the shipping emissions. It could be a levy. We can also do that in a way which also generates financing. We haven't decided on one scheme or another.

The critical point is how we can design a scheme which doesn't unfairly impair developing countries, and that is consistent with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.

According to the proposal, a significant share of the revenues collected will be used to compensate developing countries. How big is that share?

The money will flow to developing countries in two ways. Around 40 percent of revenues would go automatically back to developing countries to compensate for their increase in transport costs. And we want the vast majority of the remaining 60 percent to go to the Green Climate Fund. In total $25 billion will be raised per year, of which $10 billion will go to the Green Climate Fund.

How will the money be managed?

The scheme will be implemented by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the regulatory authority for ships. They will design and implement the scheme. There are different options on the table for the technical design on the scheme. We leave that to the experts in the IMO.

We want the money to be collected centrally and then pass it to the Green Climate Fund, to make sure the Green Climate Fund established at last year's UN Climate Conference in Cancun, Mexico, will have stable revenue.

The EU is considering adopting the same emissions trading mechanism for shipping as it has for aviation. What's your comment on this approach?

Our proposal is no alternative to the EU's unilateral regional approach. The EU has implemented a unilateral regional approach to aviation, because it's not possible to reach a global agreement. Now they are planning a regional approach to shipping. So we are saying we need a global approach to shipping which is consistent with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 邳州市| 武宣县| 右玉县| 广水市| 巴马| 兴仁县| 揭西县| 修文县| 长沙县| 正阳县| 芦溪县| 星座| 衡山县| 邢台县| 远安县| 卢湾区| 深圳市| 宝坻区| 汝南县| 桑植县| 舒城县| 济阳县| 甘孜| 银川市| 周至县| 乌鲁木齐县| 突泉县| 江都市| 高安市| 枝江市| 四子王旗| 武宁县| 青河县| 新兴县| 铁岭县| 南岸区| 东乌| 积石山| 阿拉善盟| 佳木斯市| 若羌县|