日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates
Hotel Service


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies

Trademark Dispute Goes to Court

Japan's Honda Motor Co has brought legal action against two Chongqing-based motorcycle companies alleged to have infringed on its trademark.

 

The first hearing was held yesterday at the Beijing No 2 Intermediate People's Court with one of the accused, the Chongqing Lifan Motor Factory, not being present.

 

The other defendant was the Chongqing Lifan Industrial Group and the two companies are independent of each other, according to sources.

 

No decision was handed down at the close of proceedings yesterday and it is not known when a ruling will be made.

 

Honda is asking for compensation from the two producers and a motor retailer to the tune of more than 25 million yuan (US$3 million) for alleged economic losses caused by trademark violations.

 

The plaintiff claims that motors produced by the two companies carry the trademark "Hongda," which is only slightly different to "Honda" and is easily mistaken for the more famous brand.

 

Noting "Lifan" is the group's trademark, Pang Zhengzhong, the lawyer representing the Chongqing Lifan Industrial Group, claimed: "We have never produced motors with the Hongda symbol, as accused.

 

"Furthermore, the motor used by Honda as proof (in court) was without a seal and was not convincing," he told China Daily.

 

"Only one motor cannot prove that the group has produced some 200,000 such motors, as it is alleged.

 

"As a famous domestic motor enterprise, there is no need for Lifan to infringe on others' intellectual property rights."

 

The third accused - the Beijing Zili Ziqiang Motor Shop - said in court at the start of proceedings that since the motors were allegedly produced by two independent entities, the case should not go ahead but be heard separately.

 

The court did not accept the request and decided the hearing should proceed.

 

IPR disputes in vehicle production are rising this year together with the booming automobile market. For example, the first-ever lawsuit involving a foreign auto manufacturer in China since the country's entry to the World Trade Organization started in August, with Japan's Toyota suing Chinese car manufacturer Geely for trademark infringement. But no verdict has so far been reached.

 

(China Daily November 18, 2003)

 

Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright ©China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 张北县| 商南县| 固安县| 本溪市| 石狮市| 颍上县| 玉门市| 乌海市| 喜德县| 丽江市| 云阳县| 中方县| 婺源县| 赣榆县| 龙井市| 青铜峡市| 奈曼旗| 老河口市| 潍坊市| 封开县| 磴口县| 固始县| 清原| 新民市| 东至县| 长武县| 秦安县| 平谷区| 繁峙县| 安泽县| 扶风县| 阳春市| 慈溪市| 桑日县| 平原县| 边坝县| 游戏| 湖南省| 台湾省| 中阳县| 枣庄市|