日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Listen to the Public's Voices
Adjust font size:

City planners should pay greater heed to public opinion when drawing up urban development plans, says a signed article in Beijing News. An excerpt follows:

A taxi driver in Hangzhou, capital of east China's Zhejiang Province, has taken legal action against the city's taxi management authority after it rejected his application for a low-emission cab.

The final result of the case has yet to be revealed, but public opinion is definitely with Lu, who had been suffering from rocketing fuel prices.

From the perspective of the market economy, in a fully-fledged market, it alone should be the final arbiter of what type of cab is used. Considering cost and profit factors, taxi drivers have every right to decide what type of cab they drive, so long as they remain within the law.

The government should not interfere in the taxi industry, a common service sector. Excessive intervention will only result in twisting the pricing mechanism and compromising both operators' and consumers' interests.

In addition, the State Council promulgated a regulation early this year stipulating that local governments should not restrict the use of small-engine cars while upgrading local taxis.

Hangzhou's taxi management authority used a city regulation drafted in 2002 as its excuse for rejecting Lu's request. The regulation stipulated that the discharge volume of taxis should exceed 1.8 liters, otherwise, no license would be issued. The local regulation is obviously out of step with the central government's aims.

In this instance, Hangzhou is not alone. Many cities, including Beijing, have had restrictions on the emission volume of taxis. For planners in these cities, the main consideration is a desire to enhance the city's image.

However, such a rigid regulation actually compromises the city's image. The use of luxury cabs does not necessarily mean a city is viewed in a positive light.

A city's good image is chiefly determined by whether it has a clean, efficient and law-abiding government, civilized citizens, and a clean and tidy appearance.

(China Daily May 29, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Public Should Be Included
Struggling to Survive
Let Transparency Prevail
Public Input on Law Important
Big Debate on Major Projects
?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 泽州县| 普定县| 郎溪县| 盈江县| 孝义市| 延寿县| 武强县| 阿坝县| 杭州市| 叶城县| 金寨县| 申扎县| 肇源县| 来宾市| 正镶白旗| 肃宁县| 佳木斯市| 嘉兴市| 新建县| 奉贤区| 徐汇区| 五家渠市| 临漳县| 合作市| 泽库县| 济宁市| 古田县| 维西| 九龙坡区| 松江区| 毕节市| 卢龙县| 泸定县| 淳安县| 桂林市| 深水埗区| 沁源县| 祁阳县| 喀喇| 偏关县| 梧州市|