日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Break up Monopolies
Adjust font size:

The news that employees in monopoly sectors enjoy much higher salaries than their counterparts in other sectors will be an issue for some time, given the rising anti-monopoly sentiment nationwide.

As the national labor regulation body revealed, the salary gap between workers in monopolized and competitive industries is not only stunningly big, but widening rapidly in recent years.

Many are wondering why those in monopoly sectors earn much more just for working in that industry, and not for increased hours or higher skill sets. Such a sentiment, if unresolved, will dampen social morale.

The government has promised to take steps in the coming five years toward breaking up monopolies, as mapped out in its 11th Five-Year Plan (2006-10). This is the right place to start.

In discussing solutions to break up monopolies, anti-monopoly legislation is often proposed, which would likely play a vital role. Indeed, a viable and comprehensive legal framework would equip the nation's anti-monopoly efforts with strong legal support.

Given China's realities, the government can also play a significant role in curbing the monopoly sectors from grabbing exorbitant profits within existing legal framework.

Most of China's monopoly sectors are state-controlled. It is a legacy of the highly centralized planned economy. This renders the government regulators easier access to information and more convenience in carrying out its supervisory duty.

One of the regulatory duties of the government lies in preventing monopoly sectors from taking advantage of their market position to overcharge consumers. A 2000 investigation by central China's Hunan Province's price supervisory department revealed a 163 million yuan (US$20.37 million) overcharge by local power firms to customers. A 2004 audit in central China's Henan Province found its telecom sector overcharged consumers more than 100 million yuan (US$12.5 million).

Regulators in those regions were keeping up. It shows that technical barriers or lack of wisdom are not problematic and the government can detach itself with monopolized interests only if it gathers adequate political will.

Such a political commitment is indispensable in making the country's anti-monopoly strategies.

Encouraging competition, for example, is the ultimate way of breaking up monopolies. But the government sometimes sticks to price controls to tackle the problem, as shown in the medical service sector.

Such a methodology may encounter less pressure from monopolized interests, but is less effective in the long run.

(China Daily May 19, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Monopoly Law Has Holes
End 'Monopoly Welfare' by Law
Monopoly Days Are Over
Breakup of State Monopolies, End to Unfair Charges Urged
Breaking the Public Hospital Monopoly
Anti-monopoly Law Badly Needed
?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 永靖县| 兴仁县| 济阳县| 逊克县| 黎城县| 加查县| 华亭县| 赤城县| 鸡东县| 凌源市| 萝北县| 明光市| 南溪县| 大庆市| 顺义区| 台湾省| 灵石县| 凤翔县| 石狮市| 高阳县| 连州市| 武城县| 广德县| 常熟市| 霍城县| 北碚区| 高清| 海伦市| 杭州市| 筠连县| 星子县| 抚宁县| 山东省| 板桥市| 栾城县| 民勤县| 微山县| 北海市| 陆丰市| 开平市| 抚宁县|