日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
New Criteria for Officials
Adjust font size:

A more reasonable promotion system for government officials will help stop the fabrication of gross domestic product (GDP) indicators prevalent in local governments, says a signed article in Yanzhao Metropolis News. An excerpt follows:

In the country's 11th Five-Year Plan (2006-2010) for economic development, the goal of average yearly economic growth was set at 7.5 percent. However, in the economic programme drafted by the 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities nationwide, the average GDP growth was set at 10.1 percent and was as high as 13 percent in some regions.

There are more than one expected GDP indicators nationwide, a macro-economics researcher pointed out. All provinces, cities, counties and subordinate administrative organs have their own expanded GDP figures, he said.

Such blind pursuit of major GDP indictors is absolutely incompatible with the basic economic development principle and will bring negative effects to the country.

One of its direct results is the prevalence of GDP fabrication among grassroots governments and less efficient investment.

According to a grass-roots official in a township in Zhumadian, a city in Central China's Henan Province, his colleagues have almost been numb to GDP indicators and have never carefully compiled GDP statistics. All economic indicators reported to higher governments are arbitrary, he told China Economic Weekly.

This is an extremely abnormal social phenomenon that deserves attention from departments concerned.

The crux for this is the long existence of the officials' promotion system, in which local officials' performances are gauged mainly by local GDP development. The fact that promotion stems from figures has directly resulted in concocted statistical data and the blind pursuit of investment expansion, while no heed is paid to the real economic effects.

To stop such kinds of malpractice, a more scientific promotion system should be created to evaluate performances of officials and then decide whether they will be promoted or demoted on the basis of the unbiased evaluation.

(China Daily May 17, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
China's GDP to Grow 9.5% in 2006
Beijing's Q1 GDP Surges 13.3%
GDP in Q1 Grows 10.2%
Guangdong Targets 9 Pct Annual Growth Rate
'Rapid Growth' Expected This Year
New GDP Accounting Under Development
China Must Rely on Sustainable Growth
What Are Behind Rankings?
?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號(hào)
主站蜘蛛池模板: 泸定县| 牡丹江市| 茶陵县| 博客| 贵南县| 巫溪县| 铁岭县| 德化县| 阿拉尔市| 新疆| 平舆县| 新宾| 顺平县| 彭泽县| 思南县| 县级市| 措美县| 志丹县| 华安县| 博野县| 晋宁县| 丹阳市| 纳雍县| 绥棱县| 永宁县| 尤溪县| 封丘县| 延庆县| 赣榆县| 芒康县| 易门县| 玛沁县| 德令哈市| 孟村| 武川县| 萨嘎县| 白银市| 英山县| 绥滨县| 且末县| 济阳县|