日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Public Resources for The Public
Adjust font size:

Public resources should not be used to seek profits, says a signed article in Xiaoxiang Morning Post. An excerpt follows:

The State Council issued a document last Thursday about off-campus venues for children. It requires that cultural or science centers be operated as public welfare undertakings, and the benefit of children must be the priority. The document says that such venues should not conduct commercial activities to seek profits.

Venues like children's centers receive government investment to be run as public welfare undertakings. But some put their focus on commercial activities. It is timely for the central government to ban their commercial activities.

Under market economy conditions, some sectors forget their public welfare nature and throw themselves into the tide of profit-seeking. Venues for minors like children's centers are contracted or rented out to businesses. The space for teenagers' off-campus activities shrinks while some irrelevant or even unhealthy activities emerge in such venues.

The situation where public sector venues profit from public resources is not uncommon. For example, students' scores in the national college entrance examination are public resources, but some education departments co-operate with telecommunication companies to conduct charged information services.

From the angle of public administration, it is not cost-free for public departments, including public welfare undertakings, to provide public services. But taxpayers have paid for these services and citizens should not be charged for them. To use public resources for commercial activities amounts to privatization of public services and shows no regard to taxpayers' rights.

It seems no big deal for children's centers to conduct commercial activities, but what lies behind this is a serious problem. Related departments may have made some profit, but their public credibility is harmed. Such behavior should be banned.

At the same time, it is important to guarantee the funding for public welfare undertakings. That is the only way to put an end to commercial activities and to realize their nature as public welfare.

(China Daily April 11, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
College Gyms' Charging Dilemma
?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 阿克苏市| 普格县| 托克托县| 墨玉县| 高州市| 扎鲁特旗| 漳平市| 江川县| 泸州市| 海口市| 宜昌市| 郓城县| 兴国县| 衡阳县| 突泉县| 嘉黎县| 敦化市| 景谷| 林州市| 班戈县| 中阳县| 乌兰浩特市| 阳城县| 湖州市| 伊宁县| 河北区| 庆云县| 新丰县| 黄大仙区| 寻甸| 弥渡县| 灵山县| 株洲市| 辉南县| 荣昌县| 辽阳市| 衡阳县| 阿拉尔市| 南安市| 河池市| 恭城|