日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / China / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Keep the Milk Flowing Freely
Adjust font size:

State funding is an effective fix to revive the school milk programme that has seen stagnant growth recently, says a signed article in China Business Times. An excerpt follows:

More than half the 48 qualified suppliers for the national school milk programme have stopped or suspended their service. Reports show that only 1 per cent of the country's 240 million students in primary and high schools now drink milk at school everyday.

The school milk programme, which started in August 2000, was meant to be a key step improving youngsters' nutrition and boosting the nation's health situation.

How come the programme has seen a bottleneck in its development at this moment?

The school milk programme not only benefits the students and milk suppliers, but also the nation as a whole. Therefore, it is a public welfare initiative.

When the programme was launched, the government did not offer any subsidy or other financial aid. Instead, it simply ordered the suppliers to limit their profits and keep the milk price 30 percent lower than the market price. The suppliers could not even change this price.

When the milk suppliers could barely cover their costs, it was a reasonable choice for them to quit the business. After all, they have to survive in the market.

But as more and more suppliers leave, the programme is in danger of soon being dropped completely.

Therefore, the only way to revive the school milk programme is State funding. With strict management and efficient means to channel the State capital, the programme could be carried on.

As a matter of fact, Japan, Finland and several other countries that successfully promoted their school milk programmes have all done this through a legislative framework and offered State subsidies to cover all or part of the expenses of the programme.

The school milk programme would have long-term benefits for the nation's future.

Given the limited resources in the State coffer, authorities should put their preference on subsidies for the programme in medium and small-sized cities and rural areas. After all, the cost of a cup of milk is nothing for most families in big cities.

In less developed areas, the government could offer subsidies to cover all school milk or the milk for a certain group of students. It could boost the public welfare more efficiently while bridging the differences between rural and urban areas in milk consumption.

(China Daily September 20, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
'Education at Home' Boy to Be Sent back to School
Children Rejoice at School Opening
Beijing to Aid Migrant Schools
15,000 Children Facing Uncertain Future As Schools Close
 
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 黑龙江省| 内黄县| 旬邑县| 贞丰县| 昔阳县| 施甸县| 固阳县| 鹤岗市| 莱芜市| 江山市| 桂林市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 凯里市| 成安县| 乌拉特中旗| 聂拉木县| 长汀县| 长葛市| 如皋市| 厦门市| 肃宁县| 临邑县| 繁峙县| 张掖市| 内黄县| 布尔津县| 叙永县| 霞浦县| 苍山县| 南岸区| 五寨县| 琼中| 高邮市| 仙居县| 和田县| 道真| 旌德县| 泊头市| 志丹县| 宁阳县| 万全县|