日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Wahaha vs Danone
Adjust font size:

The rancor between Wahaha, China's leading beverage company, and its multinational partner Danone has been grabbing headlines since early this month.

 

It is unfortunate that an international business marriage that was hailed as one of the great success stories of joint ventures in China has turned sour.

 

Given the sea change that has taken place in China's business climate in recent years, it is not all that surprising that a once perfect couple may think different now.

 

Danone's joint venture with Wahaha was first signed in 1996 to sell water, yogurt and tea drinks. Both sides profited richly as Wahaha water became the leading brand in the China market.

 

Zong Qinghou, founder and chairman of Wahaha, now ranks among China's richest. For Danone, the joint venture accounted for more than 5 percent of operating profits last year.

 

Although there have long been disagreements between the two sides, the tensions threatening to tear apart the 10-year joint venture only burst into the open recently.

 

Zong accused Danone of trying to take control of certain Wahaha subsidiaries that are not part of the joint venture.

 

Danone hit back by accusing Wahaha of setting up a parallel operation that bottled and sold the same drinks as the joint venture. It also began legal proceedings against the Chinese group.

 

With a 51-percent stake, Danone technically has a decisive say in the joint venture. But as the influential chairman and general manager of the joint venture, Zong appears an inseparable driving force behind the entire Wahaha business.

 

Unfortunately, Zong's playing the card of "the country's economic security" sounds not only irrelevant but foolish. His emphasis on Wahaha as a Chinese brand is not as convincing as he might have expected.

 

The case should be addressed in a manner that puts business interests first as long as they are legal. Such a solution will not only be fair to both sides but also set an example for other joint ventures in the country.

 

(China Daily April 19, 2007)

 

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Wahaha, Danone Agreement Invalid?
Fair Play Stressed in Foreign Acquisitions
Wahaha Fights off Danone
Wake-up Call to Chinese Firms on Power of Brands
Wahaha Picks up Pace to Go Global

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 台中县| 太仓市| 建阳市| 乡城县| 贵阳市| 资阳市| 青田县| 嘉善县| 紫阳县| 广东省| 黄平县| 和政县| 怀柔区| 天镇县| 额济纳旗| 苏州市| 滕州市| 昌黎县| 中西区| 泸溪县| 连州市| 锡林浩特市| 鹿泉市| 庆云县| 甘谷县| 应用必备| 乐昌市| 上犹县| 日土县| 郎溪县| 北流市| 连南| 广灵县| 西安市| 屯门区| 苗栗市| 谢通门县| 当阳市| 樟树市| 墨玉县| 邹城市|