日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Wahaha vs Danone
Adjust font size:

The rancor between Wahaha, China's leading beverage company, and its multinational partner Danone has been grabbing headlines since early this month.

 

It is unfortunate that an international business marriage that was hailed as one of the great success stories of joint ventures in China has turned sour.

 

Given the sea change that has taken place in China's business climate in recent years, it is not all that surprising that a once perfect couple may think different now.

 

Danone's joint venture with Wahaha was first signed in 1996 to sell water, yogurt and tea drinks. Both sides profited richly as Wahaha water became the leading brand in the China market.

 

Zong Qinghou, founder and chairman of Wahaha, now ranks among China's richest. For Danone, the joint venture accounted for more than 5 percent of operating profits last year.

 

Although there have long been disagreements between the two sides, the tensions threatening to tear apart the 10-year joint venture only burst into the open recently.

 

Zong accused Danone of trying to take control of certain Wahaha subsidiaries that are not part of the joint venture.

 

Danone hit back by accusing Wahaha of setting up a parallel operation that bottled and sold the same drinks as the joint venture. It also began legal proceedings against the Chinese group.

 

With a 51-percent stake, Danone technically has a decisive say in the joint venture. But as the influential chairman and general manager of the joint venture, Zong appears an inseparable driving force behind the entire Wahaha business.

 

Unfortunately, Zong's playing the card of "the country's economic security" sounds not only irrelevant but foolish. His emphasis on Wahaha as a Chinese brand is not as convincing as he might have expected.

 

The case should be addressed in a manner that puts business interests first as long as they are legal. Such a solution will not only be fair to both sides but also set an example for other joint ventures in the country.

 

(China Daily April 19, 2007)

 

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Wahaha, Danone Agreement Invalid?
Fair Play Stressed in Foreign Acquisitions
Wahaha Fights off Danone
Wake-up Call to Chinese Firms on Power of Brands
Wahaha Picks up Pace to Go Global

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 余干县| 襄垣县| 衡山县| 沧源| 临朐县| 福清市| 墨玉县| 遵化市| 集安市| 商南县| 翁源县| 磴口县| 银川市| 安国市| 水城县| 汝州市| 嘉善县| 金平| 大庆市| 常山县| 双桥区| 靖宇县| 古蔺县| 陆丰市| 磴口县| 六盘水市| 青田县| 隆回县| 巴林左旗| 彝良县| 集安市| 含山县| 济阳县| 阳朔县| 黄大仙区| 临猗县| 淳安县| 长岛县| 罗甸县| 柘荣县| 新源县|