日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / China / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
It's about time we call to account 'journalists' who make up 'news'
Adjust font size:

If you read Chinese and have a critical mind, you would gasp in astonishment at the ridiculous news writing by some journalists.

It's not uncommon for some Chinese journalists today to cite a single source "close to the authority" in his or her attempt to fabricate a seemingly credible news story.

Xinhua news agency reported on Tuesday that the central government had just published a list of six Chinese newspapers found to have cooked up stories to the detriment either of individual companies or of the country. Most of the newspapers are city tabloids.

The General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP) told Xinhua that it had directed the six newspapers to make public apologies and to discipline the reporters and editors responsible for fabrication and spreading false "news."

I checked one of the false reports cited in the list and found it a typical example of uncritical writing.

The report, published last October, gave the full "details" of what it called in the same report nothing but a rumor. The rumor's "details" included the exact date of a government decision to possibly bail out the stock market, and six major bailout policies.

The reporter then "interviewed heads of relevant government departments," but did not say who they were or whether they asked for anonymity. After these unnamed officials denied the rumor, the reporter "interviewed a source close to the authority," but again did not say who he or she was, or at least identify his or her position.

Then came the most ridiculous part of the "interview."

The reporter quoted the "source" as saying: "Such a detailed 'bailout plan' is definitely a rumor. But I assure you that the government will publish one positive policy after another (to bail out the market) before the end of the year, and they will cover, but not be limited to, those described in the rumor."

If something is "definitely a rumor" because it's so detailed, the "source" definitely gave more details than the earlier rumor. How could a reporter publish this kind of "prediction" without any doubt?

If you talk to Chinese journalists, you will find many of them do not possess a critical spirit at all.

(Shanghai Daily April 16, 2009)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Journalist delegation leaves for Lhasa
- Local journalist exposes N. China landslide cover-up
- Western media asked to review Journalist's Creed
主站蜘蛛池模板: 常熟市| 新野县| 彭山县| 繁昌县| 和龙市| 车致| 尚义县| 巨野县| 岳阳县| 南充市| 宜兰市| 新巴尔虎右旗| 常山县| 广灵县| 盖州市| 景洪市| 介休市| 崇阳县| 常宁市| 宣化县| 松阳县| 肇庆市| 大关县| 清水县| 荆门市| 固原市| 平定县| 黎城县| 顺平县| 五家渠市| 获嘉县| 嘉定区| 宜黄县| 永丰县| 牙克石市| 娱乐| 三门峡市| 鸡泽县| 云南省| 阳原县| 闽清县|