日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / China / News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Revamp to streamline IPR battles
Adjust font size:

Special tribunals will be set up to handle intellectual property rights (IPR) disputes and an appeal court in a bid to improve efficiency, the Supreme People's Court (SPC) announced yesterday.

The move will see complex cases relating to civil, administrative and criminal matters dealt with by a "unified" tribunal, rather than spread across different ones, according to the newly issued Guideline on Implementing the Compendium of National Intellectual Property Strategy.

"If an IPR case involved two or three disputes it had to be heard in different tribunals, which was repetitious, wasted procedural costs and compromised judicial efficiency," said Kong Xiangjun, deputy chief judge of IPR tribunals for the SPC.

Pilot schemes for special tribunals have been running since the mid-1990s, including one high court, nine intermediate courts and 14 district courts, he said, with the Pudong District People's Court in Shanghai the first in 1995.

A typical case there involved Shanghai Razor Blade Co Ltd, part of the Gillette Company, which had several disputes over infringements on its trademark with local businesses and government departments.

The court was able to employ one tribunal to hear all the grievances, saving time and money.

"A unified tribunal improves efficiency and makes full use of the expertise of our IPR tribunal staff," said Chen Huizhen, chief of the Pudong court's IPR tribunals.

The guideline released by the SPC also states it will look to "set up an IPR appeal court" to deal with invalid patent and trademark affirmation disputes, while Jiang Zhipei, vice-president of the IPR association of the China Law Society, said the SPC may establish such a court in Beijing.

"Some disputes, especially the affirmation of patents and trademarks, feature highly specialized and sometimes international elements that are often too challenging for local courts to handle," Jiang told China Daily.

An appellate court will unify standards in judicial practice, particularly patent infringements and the granting of trademark rights, he said, adding: "It will also help save costs for small and medium-sized enterprises in maintaining IP rights and create a sound environment for innovation."

The global financial crisis has made infringements more complex, with some enterprises being forced to cut budgets for IP protection.

Chinese courts concluded 27,876 IPR-related cases, up 32.6 percent year-on-year, according to a work report by Chief Justice Wang Shengjun this month.

(China Daily March 30, 2009)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- China and EU reach consensus on IPR, energy, trade topics
- IPR protection not an urban legend
- China outlines national IPR improvement strategy
- 2007 Top 10 IPR protection events
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宣化县| 年辖:市辖区| 吐鲁番市| 沭阳县| 莲花县| 什邡市| 巩留县| 荥经县| 余姚市| 延吉市| 崇信县| 揭西县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 莲花县| 太仆寺旗| 玉溪市| 云浮市| 肇州县| 定边县| 井研县| 荆门市| 孟村| 阿勒泰市| 体育| 峡江县| 平邑县| 余庆县| 裕民县| 南木林县| 仁布县| 镇赉县| 固阳县| 巩留县| 九寨沟县| 察雅县| 尖扎县| 仪征市| 临夏市| 临安市| 林州市| 通江县|