日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / China / News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Revamp to streamline IPR battles
Adjust font size:

Special tribunals will be set up to handle intellectual property rights (IPR) disputes and an appeal court in a bid to improve efficiency, the Supreme People's Court (SPC) announced yesterday.

The move will see complex cases relating to civil, administrative and criminal matters dealt with by a "unified" tribunal, rather than spread across different ones, according to the newly issued Guideline on Implementing the Compendium of National Intellectual Property Strategy.

"If an IPR case involved two or three disputes it had to be heard in different tribunals, which was repetitious, wasted procedural costs and compromised judicial efficiency," said Kong Xiangjun, deputy chief judge of IPR tribunals for the SPC.

Pilot schemes for special tribunals have been running since the mid-1990s, including one high court, nine intermediate courts and 14 district courts, he said, with the Pudong District People's Court in Shanghai the first in 1995.

A typical case there involved Shanghai Razor Blade Co Ltd, part of the Gillette Company, which had several disputes over infringements on its trademark with local businesses and government departments.

The court was able to employ one tribunal to hear all the grievances, saving time and money.

"A unified tribunal improves efficiency and makes full use of the expertise of our IPR tribunal staff," said Chen Huizhen, chief of the Pudong court's IPR tribunals.

The guideline released by the SPC also states it will look to "set up an IPR appeal court" to deal with invalid patent and trademark affirmation disputes, while Jiang Zhipei, vice-president of the IPR association of the China Law Society, said the SPC may establish such a court in Beijing.

"Some disputes, especially the affirmation of patents and trademarks, feature highly specialized and sometimes international elements that are often too challenging for local courts to handle," Jiang told China Daily.

An appellate court will unify standards in judicial practice, particularly patent infringements and the granting of trademark rights, he said, adding: "It will also help save costs for small and medium-sized enterprises in maintaining IP rights and create a sound environment for innovation."

The global financial crisis has made infringements more complex, with some enterprises being forced to cut budgets for IP protection.

Chinese courts concluded 27,876 IPR-related cases, up 32.6 percent year-on-year, according to a work report by Chief Justice Wang Shengjun this month.

(China Daily March 30, 2009)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- China and EU reach consensus on IPR, energy, trade topics
- IPR protection not an urban legend
- China outlines national IPR improvement strategy
- 2007 Top 10 IPR protection events
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宁德市| 当雄县| 南靖县| 广丰县| 渭源县| 商河县| 平利县| 林甸县| 大同市| 思茅市| 竹北市| 沅江市| 阿勒泰市| 大连市| 博湖县| 湟中县| 枣庄市| 安塞县| 仙桃市| 天门市| 阿拉善左旗| 乌拉特中旗| 玉龙| 宜州市| 师宗县| 沾益县| 怀宁县| 永吉县| 河西区| 周口市| 连平县| 西华县| 六枝特区| 都昌县| 三亚市| 舒城县| 宜川县| 准格尔旗| 镇康县| 高州市| 三都|