日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

Home / Business / Business Highlights Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Chinese shoe-makers possibly unlaced of anti-dumping duties
Adjust font size:

On October 30, Wang Zhenhao, president of Aokang Group, said in an interview with the China Business News that although the lawsuits issued by five Chinese shoemakers, including his company, against the European Commission are progressing very slowly, the current situation appears to favor the Chinese side. He believes that their efforts won't be in vain.

But some people inside the shoe business are not as upbeat about the outcome of the lawsuits. They think that it is very difficult to beat the European Commission. Moreover, the lawsuits will last for a very long time: the court will rule its final decision by the end of 2008. Ironically, the anti-dumping duty imposed by the EU on Chinese shoes is invalid as of next October, two months earlier than the court ruling. This means that the lawsuits are moot for the Chinese shoe manufacturers.

But Wang doesn't agree. He is afraid that the European Commission may continue to levy anti-dumping duties on Chinese shoes for another five years, but he's also learned that the EU shoe importers and retailers stand against anti-dumping duties. He believes that with their support it would be possible for them to win this lawsuit and prevent any future barriers. Besides, with so much attention already focused on this issue, his company has landed in the European spotlight. For him, the lawsuits are beneficial.

In 2005, the European Union (EU) launched an anti-dumping investigation involving more than US$700 million against Chinese-made shoes. On October 7, 2006, the EU concluded that the dumping margin of Chinese shoes was 16.5 percent and decided to levy an anti-dumping duty on the shoes for two years. Two months later five Chinese shoe manufacturers: Aokang Group, Wenzhou Taima Shoes Co., Ltd., Nanhai Jinlv Shoe Industry Co., Ltd., Sun Sang Kong Yuen Shoes Factory Company Limited and Wenzhou Wanbang Shoes Industry Co., Ltd, all filed lawsuits in the EU Court of Justice against the European Commission's decision.

For more details, please read the full story in Chinese. ( http://www.china-cbn.com/s/n/000004/20071031/020000058997.shtml)

(Chna.org.cn October 31, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- EU uncovers fraudulent imports of Chinese textiles, shoes
Most Viewed >>

Nov. 1-2 Tianjin World Shipping (China) Summit
Nov. 7-9 Guangzhou Recycling Metals International Forum
Nov. 27-28 Beijing China-EU Summit
Dec. 12-13 Beijing China-US Strategic Economic Dialogue

- Output of Major Industrial Products
- Investment by Various Sectors
- Foreign Direct Investment by Country or Region
- National Price Index
- Value of Major Commodity Import
- Money Supply
- Exchange Rate and Foreign Exchange Reserve
- What does the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement cover?
- How to Set up a Foreign Capital Enterprise in China?
- How Does the VAT Works in China?
- How Much RMB or Foreign Currency Can Be Physically Carried Out of or Into China?
- What Is the Electrical Fitting in China?
主站蜘蛛池模板: 阿拉善右旗| 武宁县| 饶河县| 灵璧县| 建瓯市| 淮南市| 汉寿县| 龙山县| 内黄县| 融水| 莱阳市| 吴旗县| 平湖市| 惠州市| 巴青县| 合江县| 东乡族自治县| 大邑县| 天门市| 英山县| 金寨县| 桦南县| 贵阳市| 峨边| 远安县| 威宁| 简阳市| 青龙| 丽水市| 明星| 孟州市| 布拖县| 宜兴市| 夏津县| 庄河市| 凤凰县| 宜丰县| 惠东县| 灌南县| 黑河市| 区。|